Pages

Showing posts with label CFA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CFA. Show all posts

Saturday, October 2, 2010

October updates to the Investment Writing blog


If you’re not visiting my InvestmentWriting blog in its new location, you’ve missed the following posts over the last month:



____________________  
Receive a free 32-page e-book with client communications tips when you sign up for my free monthly newsletter.  
Copyright 2010 by Susan B. Weiner All rights reserved

Monday, June 28, 2010

"Where Are We Heading? The Future of Investment Management in Boston"

The future of investment management in Boston was the focus of a panel presentation to the Boston Security Analysts Society's annual meeting on June 24. The view that Boston is being left behind made the greatest impact on me, but I'll report some of the opinions of all four speakers.


Reamer: Emphasis on actively managed equities hurts Boston
The investment world is shifting toward aggressive hedge funds and passive quantitative funds, said Norton Reamer, vice-chairman and founder, Asset Management Finance LLC. There's also currently an emphasis on fixed income. This is because the public has been discouraged by the stock market returns of the past two years. They want defensive, safe investments. On a related note, large pension funds are moving more toward indexing.


These trends don't favor Boston, the home of the original mutual fund, because local firms emphasize actively managed mutual funds. At least these trends don't bode well in the immediate future.


For Boston to prosper, it must attract assets from around the world, said Reamer. However, he sees the action shifting to New York, London, and even Philadelphia and California. Boston has only one of the 10 largest hedge funds and three of the 30 largest. While Boston has a history of venture capital, venture capital is less important than private equity, which is concentrated elsewhere, said Reamer.


One of Reamer's comments held a glimmer of hope. Universities--along with arbitrage groups, traders, and others--are the source of the new ideas that are changing the investment world. Boston has some great universities. Perhaps the universities can fuel the region's resurgence as an investment center. I'm happy to note that the Boston Security Analysts Society's program committee has a subcommittee devoting to inviting speakers from academia.


Putnam: Four trends will create many losers, few winners 
Investment management is a craft, said Don Putnam, managing partner of Grail Partners, who moderated the panel. He emphasized the need to avoid losing sight of the craft before he described the four trends that he believes are changing the industry.


As a result of these trends, there will be many losers and few winners, said Putnam. The winners will be global firms as well as small cadres of capable people. The big challenge for money management will be to connect these two groups.


Trend 1: The long, complicated supply chain is reordering. For example, people are seeing the problems with "the slices taken off for people who deliver golf balls." I assume Putnam was referring to wholesalers and the broader issue of 12b-1 fees and the like, though he said that he was not making a case for fee-only advisors. Changes are coming as a result of regulatory pressures, client demands, and "better mousetraps," such as ETFs and active ETFs. Putnam said he's sceptical about growth opportunities for the mutual fund industry.


Trend 2: The relevance of specialization is declining. Why? Because the efficient frontier--and the need to diversify into many slices of the market--has been challenged. "It has been proven to be nonsense for the client," said Putnam. Clients' "true utility equation" can be delivered more efficiently with quantitative solutions, he added.


Trend 3: The arithmetic of the investment business is changing with the rising importance of asset allocation. As the utility of money management has declined, fees have risen, said Putnam. This can't last. While clients have bought the "myth of comfort and control," the past three years have increased client dissatisfaction.


Trend 4: Technology is increasing in importance. Technology should be woven into every aspect of money management, said Putnam. Technology's influence on money management has barely begun.


Manning: Structure your firm to have an edge over your competition 
You must deliver great results to keep assets, said Robert J. Manning, who spoke as CEO of MFS Investment Management, but is scheduled to become the firm's chairman on July 1. This means you must structure your firm to have an edge over your competition. Manning discussed three key elements of MFS' structure.


1. Follow a long-term investment philosophy. The world is preoccupied with short-term investment returns. However, MFS believes that you need a culture of long-term investing backed by an appropriate compensation structure. When MFS conducts performance reviews, it only considers periods of three years or longer.


2. Create a global footprint. If your people are only in Boston, you can't be a winner, said Manning. For example, if you don't have staff in Europe, you can't respond quickly enough when credit default swaps widen in Europe. As part of the global footprint discussion, Manning emphasized the need to integrate the firm's fixed income and equity teams.


3. Analysts are more important than portfolio managers. The old model is broken, said Manning. The most important employees are career analysts who have expertise in specific sectors. MFS has eight global sector heads. These are the people who, if they "see a storm coming" get the entire firm out before it hits.


The increased importance of analysts has been driven partly by the fact that clients want to buy "specialized sleeves of alpha." This is reflected in analysts' compensation. At MFS, analysts earn more than portfolio managers.


We sell the global research platform, not the portfolio manager, said Manning. The portfolio manager simply assembles the alpha streams from the analysts the way that clients want.


Hughes: Confident in Boston's future 
Larry Hughes, CEO of BNY Mellon Wealth Management, said that Boston's talent and innovation makes his firm feel confident about Boston's future.


Still, the next decade will pose challenges for wealth managers in terms of how to protect clients against continued market volatility and how to capture the related opportunities. Hughes suggested three areas for focus.


1. Investment innovation--The "set it and forget it" ways of the past won't work any more, said Hughes. It's important to capture trends that develop--and disappear--in months, or perhaps even just weeks.


2. Seamless and dynamic planning--Wealth managers must "plan across silos," considering all aspects of clients' lives, including taxes, estate planning, health care, and more.


3. Better manager-client engagement--It's important to speak in your clients' terms. Clients don't talk about the efficient frontier, standard deviation, or r-squared, said Hughes. So neither should wealth managers. Instead, wealth managers should present issues in straightforward terms, such as "helping you maintain your lifestyle."

Related posts:
* Investment management career advice from industry pros
* "Have mutual fund fees gone up or down?"
* GMO's Jeremy Grantham on "The Ethical Hole in Finance" at #CFA2010
____________________  
Receive a free 32-page e-book with client communications tips when you sign up for my free monthly newsletter.  
Copyright 2010 by Susan B. Weiner All rights reserved

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Investment management career advice from industry veterans


Investment industry veterans' somewhat gloomy outlook for Boston's asset management firms prompted me to ask, what should the people in this room do to promote their careers?


I asked this question during the Q&A session following "Where Are We Heading? The Future of Investment Management in Boston," a June 24 panel presentation to the Boston Security Analysts Society's annual meeting. You'll find the panelists' suggestions below.


Keep learning, said Donald H. Putnam, managing partner, Grail Partners LLC. As the role of technology accelerates, you can't achieve the same outcomes as in the past using old skills. The great investors spend more time on their own skills as they get older, he added.


Take new challenges and learn new things, said Norton Reamer, vice-chairman and founder, Asset Management Finance LLC.


Be passionate about what you do, said Larry Hughes, CEO of BNY Mellon Wealth Management. If you don't feel passionate, then find something else to do.


Focus on your trade, said Robert Manning, CEO. MFS Investment Management. If you're good at what you do, you'll find a job despite the industry trends.

(Added 6/29) For more information on the panelists' presentations, read "Where Are We Heading? The Future of Investment Management in Boston."

Related posts:
* "You" can help your job hunting "thank you"
* Useful LinkedIn Groups for investment and wealth management job hunters
* Recruiter Ted Chaloner on job interviews that get results
____________________
  Receive a free 32-page e-book with client communications tips when you sign up for my free monthly newsletter.  
Copyright 2010 by Susan B. Weiner All rights reserved

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

R Koo, "Lessons from Japan: Fighting a Balance Sheet Recession" at #CFA2010

Lessons from Japan? What lessons can we learn from Japan? They did everything wrong, didn't they?

The questions above are the reactions that Richard Koo, chief economist of the Nomura Research Institute and author of The Holy Grail of Macroeconomics: Lessons from Japan's Great Recession often gets when he presents on  "Lessons from Japan: Fighting a Balance Sheet Recession," as he did on May 18 at the CFA Institute's annual conference.

Koo made the case that the U.S. should continue fiscal stimulus until deleveraging by the private sector is complete. If we fail to do so, we risk a double-dip recession once people become complacent about economic recovery, he said. Meanwhile, the deleveraging is necessary because of "the bursting of a debt-financed asset price bubble that leaves many private-sector balance sheet liabilities than assets."

The U.S. recession is a lot more like Japan's than most people realize. Koo's first graph showed a striking similarity between the path of U.S. housing prices, 1992-2010, and Japanese housing prices, 1977-1995.

Japan's recession management has been more successful than you might think. This is especially true in the sense that Japan's gross domestic product (GDP) grew during the recession despite massive loss of wealth and private sector deleveraging, Koo said. 

Japan could have done even better if the government had consistently supplied fiscal stimulus until private sector deleveraging ended, Koo said. He estimated that Japan might have suffered only seven to eight years, instead of 15 years, if it hadn't tried to "pull the plug" on fiscal stimulus.

The U.S. has a tough task in front of it. Maintaining fiscal stimulus for an entire period is almost impossible during a peacetime democracy, said Koo. 

Here's a startling pronouncement: The U.S. has overtaken Japan in savings. This is the result of the recession, said Koo. This jump in the savings rate means that the U.S. could internally finance its fiscal stimulus. 

Interest rates will stay low, said Koo, because nobody is borrowing or lending. We have to get corporations to borrow money before we can even contemplate reducing the budget deficit, said Koo.

Some people think that the U.S. will be different from Japan because it cut interest rates more aggressively. But Koo countered that monetary policy doesn't have much impact in this kind of recession because you can't spur borrowing.

MAY 19 UPDATE: Here's link to Bloomberg.com interview with Richard Koo on the topic of his #CFA2010 presentation.

____________________  
Receive a free 32-page e-book with client communications tips when you sign up for my free monthly newsletter.  
Copyright 2010 by Susan B. Weiner All rights reserved

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

If you enjoy my #CFA2010 tweets...

...you may also enjoy my free monthly e-newsletter with practical tips for your client communications. You'll also find at least one investment or wealth management article. 

I often report on presentations to the Boston Security Analysts Society, so you know you'll see topics of interest to CFA charterholders.

Topics in the May 2010 issue included
  • Watch out for inflation, says veteran value investor, Jean-Marie Eveillard
    Treasurys vs. Treasuries--Which is the right spelling? 
  • How to guest-blog on personal finance or investing 
  • Poll: How do you sign your business emails? 
  • Last month's reader poll about ghostbloggers 
  • Morgan Creek Capital's Yusko on investing
____________________    
Receive a free 32-page e-book with client communications tips when you sign up for my free monthly newsletter.  
Copyright 2010 by Susan B. Weiner All rights reserved

GMO's Jeremy Grantham on "The Ethical Hole In Finance" at #CFA2010

I think the financial industry has lost its way and become a rogue industry. It's out of control. 

These are the comments with which Jeremy Grantham, co-founder and chief strategist of GMO opened "The Ethical Hole in Finance" part of his presentation to the CFA Institute's annual conference on May 17.

Grantham criticized the decline of ethics in investment banking since the golden years of the 1960s. Back then head of investment banks would never have permitted today's unethical practices. "They would have shot you," said Grantham.

"The ethical standard today is 'Don't go to jail if you can possibly help it,' " said Grantham.

Grantham said the shift from partnerships to public companies has accelerated the decline in investment banks' ethics. It would help to return to partnerships, but that isn't going to happen, he said. A more practical step is to require investment banks to spin off their hedge funds.

Grantham suggested that investment management firms should shift their business to more ethical companies. However, he admitted, GMO has not made this change. Grantham said that if you take business away from the firm that does business one-quarter point cheaper, that's not in the short-term interests of your clients, even though it's in their long-term interests. There's a "creative tension" between these two forces," he said.

Follow the CFA Institute's annual conference
You can learn about presentations at the CFA Institute's annual conference as they occur. Read the CFA Institute's conference blog or follow the conference using the #CFA 2010 hashtag on Twitter.

____________________  
Receive a free 32-page e-book with client communications tips when you sign up for my free monthly newsletter.  
Copyright 2010 by Susan B. Weiner All rights reserved

Friday, May 14, 2010

Hear Roger Ibbotson on asset allocation for free on May 27, thanks to CFA Institute

Roger Ibbotson will speak about "The Importance of Asset Allocation" in a live audio webcast on May 27 at 1:00 p.m. EDT. You can register on the CFA Institute's website.

This event is free, even to non-members of the CFA Institute.

If you read "Roger Ibbotson attacks asset allocation 'folklore,' " you know I think Ibbotson is worth hearing.
____________________  
Receive a free 32-page e-book with client communications tips when you sign up for my free monthly newsletter.  
Copyright 2010 by Susan B. Weiner All rights reserved

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Roger Ibbotson attacks asset allocation "folklore"

"The time has come for folklore to be replaced with reality" says Roger Ibbotson in "The Importance of Asset Allocation" in CFA Institute's Financial Analysts Journal (March/April).

Folklore means "the idea that asset allocation policy explains more than 90 percent of performance," which is a misinterpretation of the classic 1986 article, "Determinants of Portfolio Performance" by Gary Brinson, Randolph Hood, and Gilbert Beebower, says Ibbotson. 

"Asset allocation is very important, but nowhere near the 90 percent of the variation in return is caused by the specific asset allocation mix," writes Ibbotson. Rather, active management plays a role equal to that of asset allocation, as shown by "The Equal Importance of Asset Allocation and Active Management," an article co-authored by Ibbotson with James Xiong, Thomas Idzorek, and Peng Chen in the same issue of the Financial Analysts Journal.

____________________  
Receive a free 32-page e-book with client communications tips when you sign up for my free monthly newsletter.  
Copyright 2010 by Susan B. Weiner All rights reserved

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Harry Markopolos on "next Ponzi scheme"

"Where do you think the next big Ponzi scheme will occur?" That's what I asked Harry Markopolos, author of No One Would Listen, during the Q&A following his March 30 talk to Boston Security Analysts Society (BSAS).

Markopolos isn't too worried about seeing another big Ponzi scheme soon. He gave two reasons.
  1. Markets are down. That's what triggered the redemptions that brought down Madoff and others.
  2. The SEC is now making Ponzi schemes a high priority.
However, most Ponzi schemers don't register with the SEC, said Markopolos. That helps them to stay hidden from the SEC. Markopolos said the SEC typically finds out about Ponzi schemes through tips. The many poor-quality tips submitted to the SEC make it hard to sort out the good from the bad. 

If you'd like to learn more about Markopolos' perspective, check out his book. Many BSAS members lined up after the talk to have him sign their books. He's a hometown favorite and past president of the BSAS.

Related post
* Tweets on talk by Harry Markopolos, Madoff whistleblower





____________________ 
The next session of "How to Write Blog Posts People Will Read: A Five-Week Teleclass for Financial Advisors" will start in April. If you can't attend this session, sign up to receive "Information on upcoming classes, workshops, and other events" as well as my free monthly newsletter.
Copyright 2010 by Susan B. Weiner All rights reserved

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Tweets on talk by Harry Markopolos, Madoff whistleblower

Here are my tweets on today's talk to the Boston Security Analysts Society by Harry Markopolos, the Madoff whistleblower and author of No One Would Listen.
  • "This case was a global tragedy" said Markopolos. "It was beyond evil."
  • Madoff case is only in its 2nd innings, said Markopolos. There'll be more arrests due to cooperating witnesses.
  • CFA# Code of Ethics is important to Markopolos. "It's about investors and doing the right thing," he said.
  • CPAs, is this true? CPA code of conduct lacks affirmative duty to report fraud.
  • Lesson #1 for Madoff victims: 0-25% is proper allocation to hedge funds, said Markopolos
  • Lesson #2 for Madoff victims: Never put all of your eggs in one basket, said Markopolos
  • Markopolos book is a good road map for conducting due diligence, said Sam Jones of the CFA Institute's board of governors. 

____________________
The next session of "How to Write Blog Posts People Will Read: A Five-Week Teleclass for Financial Advisors" will start in April. For more information, sign up to receive "Information on upcoming classes, workshops, and other events" as well as my free monthly newsletter.
Copyright 2010 by Susan B. Weiner All rights reserved

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Some ammo for job-hunting -- and client-seeking -- CFA charterholders

Employers--and potential investment management clients--don't understand why they should hire a CFA charterholder instead of a non-charterholder. That's the lament of some job-hunting and client-seeking colleagues of mine in the Boston Security Analysts Society.

"Fund managers with CFAs take fewer risks than those with MBAs, study says," an article by Ian McGugan in Canada's The National Post, provides one reason for choosing a CFA charterholder. Charterholders are going to take fewer risks in portfolios compared to MBAs.

"This result is surprising and may have something to do with the ethics instruction that is part of the CFA course but not most MBA programs," writes McGugan.

This newspaper article is based on research by Oguzhan C. Dincer of Illinois State University, Russell B. Gregory of Allen Massey University - Department of Commerce, and Hany A. Shawky of SUNY at Albany - School of Business and Center for Institutional Investment Management.

You can download "Are You Smarter than a CFA'er?"  from the SSRN website, where registration may be required. 

Thank you, Matthew Andrade, member of the Calgary CFA Society, for bringing the National Post article to my attention!
____________________
Susan B. Weiner, CFA
If you're struggling to pump out a steady flow of good blog posts, check out my five-week teleclass for financial advisors, "How to Write Blog Posts People Will Read," and sign up for my free monthly
Copyright 2010 by Susan B. Weiner All rights reserved

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

To GIPS or not to GIPS in your presentations

Must every presentation you give include the seemingly endless GIPS disclosures if your investment management firm claims GIPS compliance? For answers, I turned to Dave Spaulding,  president of The Spaulding Group and author of the Investment Performance Guy blog.

The short answer is "It depends." When you hand someone a document containing performance data, you should either include the relevant GIPS disclosures or make sure that you've provided the disclosures during the past 12 months. There's no exception to this rule. 


However, you've got more leeway when you make a live, in-person presentation to prospects or clients. You can't mislead your audience. But you don't need to include all of your GIPS data and disclosures in your live presentation. The keys are to
•    Provide enough information that your viewers understand what they're seeing
•    Label as "supplementary" any performance information that is neither required  nor recommended
•    Hand your audience members a hard copy of your GIPS presentation
 

If you follow these rules, your presentations can focus on what you and your audience care most about. By the way, Dave's presentation to the Boston Security Analysts Society on fixed income attribution was one of the top-drawing posts on my blog in 2009, so I thank him for helping to grow my audience.


Related posts
•   What does GIPS verification mean?
•   A quant's guide to detecting a future Madoff
•   Top five tips for investment performance advertising
•  SEC update to CFA Institute's GIPS conference
 
____________________
Susan B. Weiner, CFA
If you're struggling to pump out a steady flow of good blog posts, check out my five-week teleclass for financial advisors, "How to Write Blog Posts People Will Read," and sign up for my free monthly e-newsletter.
Copyright 2010 by Susan B. Weiner All rights reserved

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Strong words from editor of Financial Analysts Journal

"...I hereby consign the shibboleth of 'uncorrelated return' to the scrap heap of asset allocation lingo, where it shall be available only to unscrupulous sellers, credulous buyers, and unschooled investment analysts."

-- Richard M. Ennis, executive editor, Financial Analysts Journal

These strong words from Ennis appeared in in his "Editor's Corner" entitled "The Uncorrelated Return Myth," Financial Analysts Journal (Nov./Dec. 2009). 

Ennis asserts that "The notion of the existence of 'uncorrelated return' assets with handsome risk premiums flies in the face of financial theory and conflicts with empirical evidence." 

When he says "financial theory," Ennis is referring to the capital asset pricing model, which accords positive risk premiums to market-correlated assets. He also says that evidence shows that so-called uncorrelated assets such as real estate, hedge funds, and private equity are actually highly correlated with the stock market.

What do YOU think about this topic?


____________________
Susan B. Weiner, CFA
Check out my website at www.InvestmentWriting.com or sign up for my free monthly e-newsletter.
Copyright 2010 by Susan B. Weiner All rights reserved

Friday, November 6, 2009

Private equity job hunting tips from four professionals

"Don't bring me a resume. Bring me a deal," said Daniel Meader, founder and managing partner, Trinity Advisory Group. Meader offered his advice during the Q&A following "The State of Private Equity: Opportunity through Crisis," a sold out presentation to the Boston Security Analysts Society on November 5.

Other advice from panelists:
  • In New England, the best job prospects are in venture. The corporate growth and buyout styles of private equity are stagnant locally, said Martin Grasso, CEO, Pearl Street Capital Group.
  • It's good to have consulting experience as well as investment expertise, according to Scott Stewart, MS in Investment Management Faculty Director, Boston University School of Management.
  • Get operating experience in turning around a distressed company, suggested Norman Rice, partner, ConsensusCapital Group.
Do you have more tips for private equity job hunters? Please add them in the comments.
____________________
Susan B. Weiner, CFA
Check out my website at www.InvestmentWriting.com or sign up for my free monthly e-newsletter.
Copyright 2009 by Susan B. Weiner All rights reserved

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Fixed income viewpoints from CFA Institute conference

Here are opinions on currency and CDOs that grabbed my attention at the CFA Institute's Fixed Income conference last week.

If YOU were at the conference, I'd be interested to learn what surprised or intrigued you. 

“The New Currency World Order”
Ron Liesching of Mountain Pacific Group, LLC

The U.S. dollar cannot be replaced as the world’s reserve currency, but its role will be profoundly altered.

It’s time for investors to consider
*  Hedging their U.S. dollar risk
*  Active currency management
*  Active long commodity allocation
*  Long commodity currencies
*  Strategically long emerging market currencies
*  Global is the new core

“The Pricing of Investment-Grade Credit Risk during the Financial Crisis” 

Joshua Coval, Harvard Business School

There’s evidence that ratings agencies bent their standards to bestow too many AAA ratings.  They rated 75.5% of CDOs’ capital structure as AAA, when the rating agency model allowed 63.4%, according to “Did Subjectivity Play a Role in CDO Credit Ratings?” by John Griffin and Dragon Tang. Thanks, Prof. Coval, for sending me the link to Griffin and Tang's article!

The collapse of structured products will impact the economic recovery to the extent that cheap credit is less available. The U.S. consumer had been the engine of U.S. GDP growth thanks to cheap credit.

Related posts:
* Dan Fuss: Bond investors have learned from experience...not

____________________
Susan B. Weiner, CFA
Check out my website at www.InvestmentWriting.com or sign up for my free monthly e-newsletter.
Copyright 2009 by Susan B. Weiner All rights reserved

Monday, October 5, 2009

Dan Fuss: Bond investors have learned from experience…not

In some ways, famed bond investor Dan Fuss is pleased by how far the bond market has come during the last year. October and November 2008 made for a “horrific experience” he said. Since then, bonds have made an incredible recovery. However, their rebound has also brought back some of the behavior that fed their problems, said Fuss to the Fixed Income Management 2009 conference of the CFA Institute on October 1. Fuss is vice chairman of Loomis, Sayles & Company and co-manager of a number of institutional separate accounts for the firm’s fixed income group.

Fixed income’s bleak months in 2008, when it was difficult to get bids for even the highest quality investments left an impact on Fuss. On paper, October and November offered a fantastic buying opportunity. He spoke of a “50-year opportunity in bonds”  in November 2008. Unfortunately, instead bond funds struggled last autumn to sell in response to mutual fund redemptions. 


As a result, now Fuss pays more attention to liquidity of his investments, even if it means that “I’m fighting the last war.” Compared to 18 months ago, “I’ll give up something to buy something more liquid,” he said.

Until a few months ago, Fuss thought he wouldn’t see a repetition of the risky behavior that he illustrated with his fable of Colossal Corporation, the world’s largest maker of “colossals,” a product Fuss made up for the purpose of his story. Colossal Corp. began by dabbling in hedging the price of ore and the Australian dollar, and then went heavily into the carry trade. Eventually, it got burned by the credit crunch and decided to give up its speculative ways.

For awhile Fuss thought that the Colossal Corporations of the world had learned the lesson that they should stick to their business rather than speculating in financial markets. “I thought that was all history,” he said. However, over the last three to four months, he observed that “By God, this thing is starting to replay…. The people who skate on thin ice when they shouldn’t are starting to skate on thin ice again.”

Speculation is reviving because of the steep yield curve, said Fuss. There is an enormous incentive to go out the yield curve to pick up yield. He discussed a risky new product that made its debut in Japan in March 2009. The Japanese product is being copied by others. “I can’t believe this is happening,” said Fuss.

Recently, traders at Loomis Sayles told Fuss that he should act quickly if he’d like to get in on a B- credit that would pay a special dividend. “I thought it was a joke,” said Fuss. But it was not.

____________________
Susan B. Weiner, CFA
Check out my website at www.InvestmentWriting.com or sign up for my free monthly e-newsletter.
Copyright 2009 by Susan B. Weiner All rights reserved

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

What does GIPS verification mean?

I'm an amateur when it comes to understanding investment performance standards. So I was surprised when a speaker at the CFA Institute's GIPS (global investment performance standards) conference speaker said verification does NOT verify that firm's composite numbers are correct or that firm is compliant. Huh?

As I understand it, verification simply means the firm has the right processes to be compliant and to calculate performance accurately.

If you've got questions about this topic, I suggest you mosey on over to the Investment Performance Guy's blog, which includes a post on "Verification verifies compliance...not!" Blogger David Spaulding, president of The Spaulding Group, Inc., looks like a valuable resource for your GIPS and performance questions. Back in March 2009, I enjoyed writing "Fixed income attribution falls short" about his talk to the Boston Security Analysts Society.

Related posts:
SEC's update to CFA Institute's GIPS conference
A quant's guide to detecting a future "Madoff"
Top 5 tips for investment performance advertising

____________________
Susan B. Weiner, CFA
Check out my website at www.InvestmentWriting.com or sign up for my free monthly e-newsletter.
Copyright 2009 by Susan B. Weiner All rights reserved

Sunday, September 27, 2009

A quant's guide to detecting a future "Madoff"

Worried about getting taken in by an investment management Ponzi scheme?

With the SEC ratcheting up its fraud detection efforts, it's less likely that you'll get scammed, based on what I heard at the CFA Institute's GIPS conference last week. But the conference also introduced me to a quantitative method for detecting fraud in "The Importance of Risk and Attribution in the Post-Madoff Era" by Dan diBartolomeo, president and founder of Northfield Information Services.

The solution boils down to identifying investment returns that aren't economically feasible. The effective information coefficient is an important tool for that, said diBartolomeo. 

A personal commitment to preventing future Madoff-style fraud 
DiBartolomeo wants to make people more aware of--and attentive to--risk.  He's so committed that every year he hires a pickpocket to attend his annual client conference and warns his clients that "Keith the thief" will be targeting their wallets, watches, and other possessions. Despite the warning, each year, diBartolomeo has to return a pile of stolen goods. Keith succeeds because he's good at distracting people--and Bernie Madoff was good at this, too, said diBartolomeo.

Speaking of Madoff, diBartolomeo's firm was involved in the efforts of Harry Markopolos to uncover the secret to Madoff's steady investment returns. At the time, diBartolomeo only knew that he was analyzing the returns of Manager B. But within a few hours, analysis revealed that Manager B's returns "were either fictitious or had arisen from a strategy other than what was being represented to investors, wherein returns were probably being enhanced by illegal means." You can read more of the details of this analysis in a March 2009 FactSet podcast with diBartolomeo. 

How to uncover a fraud 
"Do these returns make sense?" That's an essential question for those who perform due diligence on potential investments, according to diBartolomeo. Returns-based methods aren't adequate for analyzing this question, he said. Instead, one needs "a risk-based measure of investment performance that can detect manager skill(or lack thereof) quickly."

The information ratio is one place to start, but it has flaws. The information ratio has nothing to do with making money for investors," said diBartolomeo. For example, the information ratio would look great for a manager with alpha of 1 basis point and a tracking error of zero, but the manager's clients wouldn't benefit much. He also pointed out that "the statistical significance of a ratio is hard to calculate."

The effective information coefficient (EIC) could be the answer to this problem. For more details on the EIC, read "Measuring Investment Skill Using the Effective Information Coefficient," which appeared in The Journal of Performance Measurement (Fall 2008). 

I wonder what Madoff's EIC was. I don't know if diBartolomeo got an opportunity to calculate it.

Oct. 31 update: diBartolomeo's talk is now available as a podcast from the CFA Institute.


____________________
Susan B. Weiner, CFA
Check out my website at www.InvestmentWriting.com or sign up for my free monthly e-newsletter.
Copyright 2009 by Susan B. Weiner All rights reserved